Power: Privileges, entitlements, and other tactics

Privilege abuse is "The wrongful or unlawful misuse of power in one's duties, either at the expense of others or to the advantage of the abuser." -- thefreedictionary.com

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.

"It reminded me of how important it is that we have the courage to push back against hearing people who consider us damaged and who therefore see us as 'less' than themselves. And who think, therefore, that we are not in a position to 'criticize' them or their misguided ways of thinking about those who are Deaf. We must continue to 'criticize' their oppressive and educate/enlighten them at the same time." -- Lyn Wiley (2015).

Oppression Tools

The tools of oppression are often disguised or hidden, such as as privileges.

Keep in mind how an unethical act of a hearing interpreter or a hearing professional can be upsetting for deaf people [an oppressed linguistic-cultural group within a phonocentric system].

This post looks at some incidents, a case study in particular, which highlight privileges, entitlements, and such. It reflects on how a privileged person can use their systemic power as a platform. The voices (in quotes) from different sources are compiled into a coherent collage-story to tell the overall picture.

For a starter, let's look at a situation: President Biden's White House announced that they would provide an interpreter for all White House news briefings, which the American Deaf community applaused this. But, when they learned who the interpreter was, they were traumalized by the interpreter's past actions.

The interpreter provided "sign language accompaniments to right-wing videos. Some of these videos have featured vaccine misinformation, conspiracy theories about the 2020 election and the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol, and false claims about Michelle Obama being transgender, according to a review of social media posts by TIME." -- TIME.

As a result, American Deaf people demanded White House to replace the interpreter for her past pro-Trumpism actions. The January 6th riots were clearly traumatizing for many Americans and other caring people aboard. Generally speaking, interpreters are required to practice code of ethics, intergrity, impartiality, and so on. By a normal standard, Deaf people can request a replacement of an interpreter for various reasons such as ethical violations, underqualification, conflict of interests, mistrust, and such.

Jon Henner said in TIME, "For me, it would be problematic for someone who has aligned herself with alt-right discourses to be the public face of the White House for the deaf communities ...videos, particularly those relating to overturning the election, could arguably constitute a conflict of interest when it comes to interpreting for the Biden White House." -- TIME"

The CEO of the National Association of the Deaf, Howard Rosenblum, "Federal law defines a qualified interpreter as one that is able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially. Consequently, the White House needs to ensure that it properly vets the interpreters that handle their press briefings to ensure that their qualifications meet the federal standard." -- TIME

The Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf also has a Code of Professional Conduct, which is "designed to guide interpreters and recommends that interpreters both disclose and avoid any 'actual or perceived conflicts of interest' in their work."

"The real answer: trust is both earned and a matter of perception. As this news of her Trumpism spreads, fewer will trust she's conveying the true message - so that trust has already been squandered." -- rm -rf /home/trump. Twittter, January 25, 2021.

Deaf people choose interpreters for assignments that they have put faith in and have the right to request for a different interpreter when an issue or concern arises.

"Serving as a sign language interpreter is a privilege because we welcome (not always willingly) you into the most private aspects of our lives. If you abuse that privilege, we have the right to ask you to depart."

Playing a card and entitlements

Playing a [fill-in] card is defined as to use a particular quality, argument, etc. in order to gain an advantage. An interpreter or a hearing professional uses a tactic of playing the cards, when a wrongdoing whether perceived or actual has occurred

For example, the forementioned interpreter defended herself in her statement, saying "my role as a RID-certified interpreter...", many Deaf responded regarding her actions.

Cartoon by Adrean Clark on Mewshaw
Credit: Adrean Clark, February 12, 2021. myhandsfull.com / www.instagram.com/adreanaline/

Another is example when a person uses a status (e.g. coda) as something to overshadow one's wrongdoing in context of interpreting. There are many wonderful, true-to-heart CODAs whom we fondly love, but not all CODAs are alike.

Again, the forementioned interpreter defended, "As a CODA, I am in-between two worlds, the Deaf and the hearing, and I am in a unique position to unite those two worlds together." The responses were: "Oh man, this screams saviorism..." -- Morgan , Twitter. "YIKES." -- Katy.

With better accessibility and education, Deaf people in the modern time are bilingual-bicultural. We live in both worlds, even though not all of us can vocally speak but we do know written English. And, that person is not in a "unique" position to unite two worlds; we don't need paternalism.

"Interpreting for the White House 'is an honor, not a privilege." -- Jon Henner (Source: washingtonpost.com) Deaf people and organizations choose or accept interpreters, not interpreters choosing themselves.

"...the purpose of the interpreter is for us to be able to participate in the public sphere as fully engaged citizens. The interpreter is not there for your entertainment or feel-good about yourselves moments." -- notanangrydeafperson.

Denial and suppression

When the forementioned interpreter defends themselves by claiming that they follow or practice the code of ethics. It's their own word or belief but their action says otherwise.

Instead of listening to the interpreter in question's interpretation of the code of ethics, a commenter reframed the power [self-empowerment], "We have interpreted her conduct as a violation of CPC Tenets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Rather than trust her interpretation of CPC, because her interests are involved, we should read and judge for ourselves. Here's the RID document..." -- notanangryperson, Feb 11, 2021.

"talks about the code of professional conduct like 3.8 doesn't exist. '3.8 Avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest that might cause harm or interfere with the effectiveness of interpreting services'. The words 'or perceived' are there intentionally." -- Camarie, Twitter, Feb 5, 2021.

"Whelp, any questions I had about whether her identity as the person working with the far right group had been confirmed or whether her ties to that group would effect her work for the white house have all been answered, and not the way she seems to think she was answering them." -- Eterlin Blue, Twitter, Feb 6.

Are Deaf people's voices not be allowed to express? To fight for social justice? Does a person in systemic power have the privilege (definitely not a right) to suppress our voices?

Silencing tactics

The more hearing professionals use any form of exploitation, the louder Deaf people speak out. Then the forementioned interpreter in her defense decides to use a threatening tactic against the minority oppressed group, such as a broadcasting statement or a lawsuit. The privileged person may have a network or power tools to use.

"If we communicate we cannot trust an interpreter, what should the interpreter do? Bully the deaf person, go on all the national tv networks to promote further violence toward deaf people, and twist people's understanding of how interpreting works? That is what happened." -- notanangrydeafperson.

Becoming an ally

Being able to look within and unpack -isms, privileges, biases, enabler-ness, and so on, is a healthy process. Listen. Ask questions. Dialogue. Own up any inappropriate words or actions.

Practice ethics in one's profession (specifically English-ASL interpreting). Ethics still counts for volunteer interpreting. Understand how traumatizing it can be for deaf people to have interpreters who act with any degree of ethical violations.

"Deaf people are the experts on our own access needs. Thank you very much. If you are not a signing person ..., then this is not your space. Do not comment. ... You don't have our lived experience as deaf people." -- notanangryperson.

References

"President Biden's First White House Sign Language Interpreter Has Ties to the Far Right" by Abigail Abrams, January 27, 2021. https://time.com/5933592/white-house-sign-language-interpreter/

"Work as Sign Language Interpreters is a Privilege, not a Right" https://notanangrydeafperson.medium.com/work-as-sign-language-interpreters-is-a-privilege-not-a-right-8ac16895da81

Related posts

Explore hearing privilege, allyship, or institutional audism, glass ceiling.

New to sign language? "Where do I start?" or "How do I start learning sign language?" This ASL Rookie guide lists some selected links to the tutorials for ASL beginners to get started and keep rolling. It may be a useful review for intermediate-level learners and ASL students as well.

Some tutorial pages are a mix of free and premium versions. Access to premium content and links below are available in the PatronPlus subscription. More links/posts will be added from time to time.

Are you able to carry everyday conversations in ASL? Are you a student in the intermediate levels and beyond, who wishes to boost up your signing skills? You've come to the selected tutorial series. (Some premium content are available to PatronPlus membership.)

This documentation project follows a child's language acquisition, literacy development, and phonological acquisition in sign language, specifically ASL, from newborn to age five in a natural native-ASL environment and visual culture.